Preston Stearns vs Miguel Avendano Cadena Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do Stearns and Cadena fare with their second serve points recently? Stearns performs significantly better, winning 41.18% compared to Cadena's 0%.
• In return games, Stearns shows strength, having won 47.62% of second serve return points and 37.4% of first serve return points, whereas Cadena has not secured any points in recent form.
• Under pressure, how do the players handle breakpoints? Stearns has a notable advantage, saving 50% of breakpoints in contrast to Cadena's 0% save rate.
• Over the last year, Stearns has a slightly better match win percentage at 46.15% compared to Cadena's 33.33%.
• Each player's best surface indicates strengths: Stearns excels on Hard courts with a 47% win rate, while Cadena is better on Clay, achieving a 33% win rate.
• Both players have been competing at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, with Stearns winning half of those matches, whereas Cadena has topped 33.33%.
• Regarding opponent quality, Stearns has faced less challenging competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 269.46, compared to Cadena's average opponent rank of 89.
• In deciding set situations, Cadena holds an edge, winning 50% of such sets, while Stearns has won 25% in the past year.
• Breakpoint conversion is telling: Stearns has capitalized on 37.5% of opportunities, a clear advantage over Cadena's 0% success rate.

Editorial Prediction (June 22, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Stearns and Cadena showcases distinct performances in their recent stats, with Stearns consistently demonstrating stronger form. Stearns' ability to win points on both their second serve and while returning suggests a level of tactical advantage over Cadena.

Stearns' capacity to handle high-pressure situations by effectively saving breakpoints and converting opportunities provides an additional edge. This is evident in their overall higher match win percentage and their better adaptability on hard surfaces.

Though Cadena demonstrates proficiency in deciding set scenarios, particularly on clay courts, the challenges faced at higher opponent quality levels may indicate potential struggles against Stearns.

Based on these observable trends and performance data, Stearns appears to be the likely winner in this upcoming encounter.